MSG withdraws bid to build Las Vegas-style sphere in London | ET REALITY

[ad_1]

It turns out that what happens in Las Vegas really stays in Las Vegas.

The American company behind the Sphere, the gigantic orb that shines, twinkles and sparkles just off the Las Vegas Strip, has formally withdrawn its proposal to build a sister Sphere in London.

Declaring that the plan had become hostage to political rivalries, Madison Square Garden Entertainment said this week it would take the “innovative project” to other, more “forward-thinking” cities.

The decision did not come as a huge surprise: last November, London’s Labor Party mayor, Sadiq Khan, blocked the spherewhich would have been built on a 4.7-acre site next to the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park in Stratford, east London.

The building’s exterior, wrapped in 54,000 square meters of LED lighting, would have been an obvious source of light pollution for nearby residents, Khan concluded.

But some argued that the Sphere’s spiteful demise testified to the complexities of building major projects in Britain. The Conservative National government, citing budget constraints, recently scaled back a high-speed rail line between London and Manchester that was the cornerstone of its plan to spread economic prosperity to the north.

Placing an imitation of Las Vegas on the site of a former parking lot next to a commuter train station did not generate the kind of aesthetic debates that have dogged other major projects in London. But it agitated neighbors who didn’t relish the prospect of opening the curtains on what is, for all intents and purposes, a huge billboard, powerful enough to eclipse the glitzy palaces on the Strip.

An expert review commissioned by the Greater London Authority, written by engineering group WSP, found the project could lead to “significant damage” to the health of residents due to the impact of artificial light from the Sphere; strobe and flicker effects; and the intrusion of visible and changing light. “These adverse impacts can cause discomfort, anxiety, and other adverse effects,” the report’s authors wrote.

While the Sphere would have been built with private money, the project had to go through a multi-tiered approval process in which both the Labor mayor and the Conservative government had a say. Even after Khan rejected the project, Michael Gove, the housing minister, stayed the ruling, raising the possibility that the government could unseat the mayor.

MSG Entertainment CEO James L. Dolan was not interested in moving forward. In a letter sent Monday to the planning department, global head of government affairs Richard E. Constable said the company, which spent about $2.3 billion on the original Sphere, would take its concept elsewhere.

“After spending millions of pounds acquiring our site in Stratford and collaboratively engaging in a five-year planning process with numerous government bodies, including the local planning authority which approved our plans after careful review,” he wrote Mr. Constable, “we cannot continue to participate in a process that is nothing more than a political football between rival parties.”

It’s a disappointing end to a project that began with considerable fanfare in 2018. Even Khan initially welcomed the Sphere announcement, saying it would cement London’s reputation as a live music mecca.

With a seating capacity of 21,500 and the world’s largest, highest-resolution LED screen, the Sphere could have turned London into Europe’s equivalent of Las Vegas for highly lucrative concert residencies, much like the one Irish band U2 is hosting. currently playing at the original Sphere. .

London is no stranger to dazzling buildings: the London Eye, the giant observation wheel on the south side of the Thames, and the Millennium Dome, now the O2 Centre, opened within weeks of each other at the beginning of this century. Although they raised questions at the time, both became landmarks on the city’s skyline.

“All of these big cities have huge, old industrial zones, where it’s acceptable to put things that would never be put in the historic centers of their cities,” said Tony Travers, a politics professor and urban planning authority at the London School of Economics. . “Paris is quite capable of building Disneyland.”

What made the site acquired by MSG Entertainment particularly attractive, Professor Travers said, is that it is not far from central London and is next to a major rail link. But those qualities would also have made the Sphere more intrusive to its neighbors than if it had been built on a larger site farther from the city.

Residents complained they would have to install blackout blinds to prevent glare, while competitors warned this would cause traffic chaos. In London’s cumbersome planning process, opponents have multiple chances to block projects since they must be approved by the borough, a planning inspector and the mayor, and all such permissions can be revoked by a cabinet minister.

“What message does that send?” Professor Travers asked. “If you are an investor in a foreign capital, what would you think of London’s planning process? “It’s not a very effective ‘Britain is open for business’ sign.”

While some opponents – including the company that operates the nearby O2 Center as a concert venue – questioned whether the Sphere would be out of place in a city like London, others dismissed that concern as too valuable.

Rowan Moore, architecture critic for the London newspaper The Observer, noted that designers have long decorated buildings with dazzling light shows. In the 18th century, he wrote in an October column, whale oil lamps were used to animate the Bank of England.

“It is only the effect of time and the fading of paint and decorations that makes us think of the past as largely gray and brown,” Moore wrote, although he added that a London version could have “unacceptable impacts” on its neighbors. .

Residents who had campaigned for years against the Sphere expressed their joy. “The ghastly MSG sphere is dead forever!” Nate Higginssaid a Green Party councilor for the area where the Sphere would have been built in a social media post. “No one wants blackout blinds imposed just for displaying advertising screens the size of Big Ben and the London Eye.”

Leave a Comment